- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Ultras of North America. ( non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- List of the ultra-prominent summits of North America ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redundant to List of Ultras of North America unless the different sorting makes it distinct enough. The sorting of the latter is more consistent with the other lists of ultra-prominent mountains. Lophotrochozoa ( talk) 15:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge. If anything, I think the other page (
List of Ultras of North America) should be merged with this one. The ability to view all peaks on the continent is important and is not possible on the other page. This page allows users to sort by range or by height and is thus more valuable. --
NoGhost (
talk)
03:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- What should be done about the lists for other continents?
Lophotrochozoa (
talk)
10:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Personally, I think it would make more sense as a single table for each continent, with the region or range as a sortable column. This would be a significant undertaking though. -- NoGhost ( talk) 02:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- What should be done about the lists for other continents?
Lophotrochozoa (
talk)
10:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge. Clearly a duplicate article. A spot check confirms Lophotrochozoa's statement that most other list of ultras articles contain several tables. (The relatively short List of Alpine peaks by prominence is an exception.) But I don't have a strong opinion on which direction the merge should go. Preserving both the single table and the separation by geographic area could be accomplished by adding a geographic area column (Greenland, Canadian arctic archipelago, etc.) to the complete table, but I don't really have an opinion on whether this should be done.-- Wikimedes ( talk) 19:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge, including List of the most prominent summits of North America --- I agree with NoGhost and think that List of Ultras of North America should be merged here, into a single table with an extra column added, per Wikimedes. There is also List of the most prominent summits of North America, which should also be merged into this article. This latter list only has the top 200, while both of the others have the top 353. I don't see why we need three largely overlapping articles. — hike395 ( talk) 03:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge per Ghost DarjeelingTea ( talk) 17:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Ultras of North America. ( non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- List of the ultra-prominent summits of North America ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redundant to List of Ultras of North America unless the different sorting makes it distinct enough. The sorting of the latter is more consistent with the other lists of ultra-prominent mountains. Lophotrochozoa ( talk) 15:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge. If anything, I think the other page (
List of Ultras of North America) should be merged with this one. The ability to view all peaks on the continent is important and is not possible on the other page. This page allows users to sort by range or by height and is thus more valuable. --
NoGhost (
talk)
03:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- What should be done about the lists for other continents?
Lophotrochozoa (
talk)
10:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Personally, I think it would make more sense as a single table for each continent, with the region or range as a sortable column. This would be a significant undertaking though. -- NoGhost ( talk) 02:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- What should be done about the lists for other continents?
Lophotrochozoa (
talk)
10:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge. Clearly a duplicate article. A spot check confirms Lophotrochozoa's statement that most other list of ultras articles contain several tables. (The relatively short List of Alpine peaks by prominence is an exception.) But I don't have a strong opinion on which direction the merge should go. Preserving both the single table and the separation by geographic area could be accomplished by adding a geographic area column (Greenland, Canadian arctic archipelago, etc.) to the complete table, but I don't really have an opinion on whether this should be done.-- Wikimedes ( talk) 19:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge, including List of the most prominent summits of North America --- I agree with NoGhost and think that List of Ultras of North America should be merged here, into a single table with an extra column added, per Wikimedes. There is also List of the most prominent summits of North America, which should also be merged into this article. This latter list only has the top 200, while both of the others have the top 353. I don't see why we need three largely overlapping articles. — hike395 ( talk) 03:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge per Ghost DarjeelingTea ( talk) 17:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.