The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)reply
This list is full of primary sources, is incapable of being
verified to any encyclopaedic standard against secondary sources as most of the churches self-report (and have a vested interest in over-reporting) and are not independently scrutinised to check the numbers they report have any relation with reality, and serves primarily as a
promotional vehicle.
Orderinchaos 16:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - what is it with the human race's obsession with enumerating everything for its own sake? Unless there are some reliable and independant data sets to draw on this is only ever going to be a synthesis of original research, dependent data sources and odd battles for in/exclusion -
Peripitus(Talk) 22:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete, largely a rather crass religious penis-comparison contest.
WP:OR,
WP:SYNTH, etc, as well.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 13:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC).reply
Delete I agree with the other deletion rationales. --
99of9 (
talk) 06:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)reply
This list is full of primary sources, is incapable of being
verified to any encyclopaedic standard against secondary sources as most of the churches self-report (and have a vested interest in over-reporting) and are not independently scrutinised to check the numbers they report have any relation with reality, and serves primarily as a
promotional vehicle.
Orderinchaos 16:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - what is it with the human race's obsession with enumerating everything for its own sake? Unless there are some reliable and independant data sets to draw on this is only ever going to be a synthesis of original research, dependent data sources and odd battles for in/exclusion -
Peripitus(Talk) 22:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete, largely a rather crass religious penis-comparison contest.
WP:OR,
WP:SYNTH, etc, as well.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 13:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC).reply
Delete I agree with the other deletion rationales. --
99of9 (
talk) 06:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.