The result was delete. It is a fairly basic encyclopedic principle that the notability of a topic is determined by sources discussing it. The one keep !vote, though made in good faith, is essentially attempting an end-run around this principle. The arguments advanced in it largely could be applied to any well-defined group of topics regardless of notability, and therefore do not carry weight; the only one that is subject-specific is the assertion that the topic is encyclopedic, which is a circular argument. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:15, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Per extensive recent consensus on these types of lists. Minimal navigational purpose given that the majority of these are redlinks unlikely to become articles, and the topic of tall buildings in Shreveport as a whole has no significant coverage. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
04:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
is no present consensus for how to assess the notabilityof cross-categorized lists, that does not mean that such lists are exempt from needing to show notability at all. This article fails WP:NLIST, as I could not find any sources that describe this article's subject or its entries as a group, which as the above list of previous AfDs shows, is the practical minimum expectation for these "tallest buildings" lists. - Aoidh ( talk) 19:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. It is a fairly basic encyclopedic principle that the notability of a topic is determined by sources discussing it. The one keep !vote, though made in good faith, is essentially attempting an end-run around this principle. The arguments advanced in it largely could be applied to any well-defined group of topics regardless of notability, and therefore do not carry weight; the only one that is subject-specific is the assertion that the topic is encyclopedic, which is a circular argument. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:15, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Per extensive recent consensus on these types of lists. Minimal navigational purpose given that the majority of these are redlinks unlikely to become articles, and the topic of tall buildings in Shreveport as a whole has no significant coverage. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
04:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
is no present consensus for how to assess the notabilityof cross-categorized lists, that does not mean that such lists are exempt from needing to show notability at all. This article fails WP:NLIST, as I could not find any sources that describe this article's subject or its entries as a group, which as the above list of previous AfDs shows, is the practical minimum expectation for these "tallest buildings" lists. - Aoidh ( talk) 19:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)