From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even if the nomination is inaccurate, editors have presented valid arguments for deletion later. The request to keep the talk page discussion as a record of a page move discussion that also applied to other pages is reasonable so I'll leave it. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC) reply

List of tallest buildings in Gary

List of tallest buildings in Gary (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:LISTN as almost all of these buildings are not notable and none of them are notable for height. Also, relies on a single source which is WP:UGC and therefore not reliable. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. LISTN is about whether the group or set has been the subject or coverage, not whether any or all of the individual members of that group or set are notable. So you have not yet presented a valid deletion argument. postdlf ( talk) 15:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Show me a reliable source that covers the building as a group.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 16:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Did you intend to present a claim on that issue? postdlf ( talk) 16:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
I just did.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 20:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Look, if you want to nominate something for deletion, it's up to you to plainly state what your argument is, and to make sure your argument is actually valid. Your nomination claimed a guideline was not satisfied "because" of observations that had nothing to do with that guideline, which is what my comment pointed out to you. You're welcome. Now try harder. postdlf ( talk) 21:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even if the nomination is inaccurate, editors have presented valid arguments for deletion later. The request to keep the talk page discussion as a record of a page move discussion that also applied to other pages is reasonable so I'll leave it. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC) reply

List of tallest buildings in Gary

List of tallest buildings in Gary (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:LISTN as almost all of these buildings are not notable and none of them are notable for height. Also, relies on a single source which is WP:UGC and therefore not reliable. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. LISTN is about whether the group or set has been the subject or coverage, not whether any or all of the individual members of that group or set are notable. So you have not yet presented a valid deletion argument. postdlf ( talk) 15:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Show me a reliable source that covers the building as a group.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 16:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Did you intend to present a claim on that issue? postdlf ( talk) 16:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
I just did.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 20:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Look, if you want to nominate something for deletion, it's up to you to plainly state what your argument is, and to make sure your argument is actually valid. Your nomination claimed a guideline was not satisfied "because" of observations that had nothing to do with that guideline, which is what my comment pointed out to you. You're welcome. Now try harder. postdlf ( talk) 21:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook