The result was Delete. The consensus below is that the problems with sourcing and maintaining the article are not simply tempory issues to be overcome by editng but rather inevitable results of its nature. Thus, deletion is the appropriate outcome. If someone would like the content for use in creating a List of IPCC Fourth Assessment Report authors, I'd be happy to userfy it, but it should not be kept in its present form or scope. Eluchil404 ( talk) 04:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Inevitably incomplete page of no value. By contrast, List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming is fairly complete William M. Connolley ( talk) 08:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The consensus below is that the problems with sourcing and maintaining the article are not simply tempory issues to be overcome by editng but rather inevitable results of its nature. Thus, deletion is the appropriate outcome. If someone would like the content for use in creating a List of IPCC Fourth Assessment Report authors, I'd be happy to userfy it, but it should not be kept in its present form or scope. Eluchil404 ( talk) 04:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Inevitably incomplete page of no value. By contrast, List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming is fairly complete William M. Connolley ( talk) 08:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC) reply