The result was delete. The original research issues were not responded to, and the arguments to keep failed to address reason for nomination, which strongly suggests the reasoning for deletion is valid. Neil ☎ 10:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate information with no threshold for inclusion lacking sources so is presumably original reasearch. Appears to lack encyclopaedic merit Spartaz Humbug! 23:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The original research issues were not responded to, and the arguments to keep failed to address reason for nomination, which strongly suggests the reasoning for deletion is valid. Neil ☎ 10:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate information with no threshold for inclusion lacking sources so is presumably original reasearch. Appears to lack encyclopaedic merit Spartaz Humbug! 23:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC) reply