The result was consensus to delete. Killiondude ( talk) 06:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The point of the article is to expand upon this section of her main article. Have each type of endorsement separated with a heading, with a nice little paragraph detailing the type, and below, a list in chronological order. I don't understand who's to say that the article is useless - especially when it hasn't even been finished yet. It was literally nominated for deletion less than 5 minutes after it was created. There's nothing to defend, because nothing was able to be done. If you're so against something you've never even seen the final product of just because crappy useless articles like it have been made before, then that's your prerogative. — Status { talk contribs 08:55, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was consensus to delete. Killiondude ( talk) 06:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The point of the article is to expand upon this section of her main article. Have each type of endorsement separated with a heading, with a nice little paragraph detailing the type, and below, a list in chronological order. I don't understand who's to say that the article is useless - especially when it hasn't even been finished yet. It was literally nominated for deletion less than 5 minutes after it was created. There's nothing to defend, because nothing was able to be done. If you're so against something you've never even seen the final product of just because crappy useless articles like it have been made before, then that's your prerogative. — Status { talk contribs 08:55, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply