The result was delete. There is an overwhelming consensus to delete, and there are no arguments to keep, so closing early. -- Core desat 03:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - an unmaintainable, unsourced collection of 191 kb of data that is more-or-less a list of anyone's and everyone's personal preferences of what tourist regions are "popular". There are no objective criteria, no sourcing to see whether each entry has met those criteria, and while a couple of editors have suggested depopulating and merging or questioning why countries without much tourism get an undue number of "popular" regions listed, this list in not useful; we have plenty of articles of the Tourism in Fooland, so this monster list is unneeded and the data (unsourced as it is) is "captured" or "capturable" elsewhere. Carlossuarez46 00:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There is an overwhelming consensus to delete, and there are no arguments to keep, so closing early. -- Core desat 03:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - an unmaintainable, unsourced collection of 191 kb of data that is more-or-less a list of anyone's and everyone's personal preferences of what tourist regions are "popular". There are no objective criteria, no sourcing to see whether each entry has met those criteria, and while a couple of editors have suggested depopulating and merging or questioning why countries without much tourism get an undue number of "popular" regions listed, this list in not useful; we have plenty of articles of the Tourism in Fooland, so this monster list is unneeded and the data (unsourced as it is) is "captured" or "capturable" elsewhere. Carlossuarez46 00:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC) reply