The result was delete. There is a clear consensus to delete. If any editor wants this material to attempt a merge to the main article, just let me know. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a contested PROD. My PROD reason was "Almost by definition, one time appearing characters in almost any fiction or entertainment series are not going to be notable except in special circumstances making them particularly notable. Unless there are reliable sources for this list it should be deleted." To which the author posted a contesting comment on the talk page "THINK before deleting: Johnny Test has too many characters. Do you really want to delete before people haven't even SEEN the show can read it?". The article is unreferenced so I still think that we have notability, verifiability problems as well as a it being fancruft. This list is the sort of thing we might accept as an external link if it was published elsewhere, but it is not encyclopaedic information that should have an article here. DanielRigal ( talk) 20:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There is a clear consensus to delete. If any editor wants this material to attempt a merge to the main article, just let me know. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a contested PROD. My PROD reason was "Almost by definition, one time appearing characters in almost any fiction or entertainment series are not going to be notable except in special circumstances making them particularly notable. Unless there are reliable sources for this list it should be deleted." To which the author posted a contesting comment on the talk page "THINK before deleting: Johnny Test has too many characters. Do you really want to delete before people haven't even SEEN the show can read it?". The article is unreferenced so I still think that we have notability, verifiability problems as well as a it being fancruft. This list is the sort of thing we might accept as an external link if it was published elsewhere, but it is not encyclopaedic information that should have an article here. DanielRigal ( talk) 20:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply