- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per my note below. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
The opera corpus
- The opera corpus ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redundant to List of important operas.
The two articles share identical scope (though not content: this one is an indiscriminately bloated and completely unreferenced assortment, the other one is a Featured List). I see no prospects for a merger so this one has to go. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 07:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a valuable list of opera composers and their most important operas. The scope, format, order, content, and text of List of important operas is completely and utterly different, as even a passing glance reveals. Softlavender ( talk) 09:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a very useful list, which should be kept under its original name,
The opera corpus.
Cote d'Azur (
talk) 09:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I've returned the article to its original title, as it had been moved to an inaccurate title without discussion. See the thread I started on the article's talk page. Softlavender ( talk) 10:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep – This list is not redundant. It is more inclusive than the List of important operas. It is a helpful encyclopedic compendium/almanac of a wide range of operas, and its red links are useful to identify missing articles. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 09:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: This list is currently listed here, at AfD, and it's PRODed at the same time; shouldn't it be one or the other? --
Michael Bednarek (
talk) 09:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- It wasn't PRODed, it was SPEEDYed. The way to contest a CSD is to click the link in the template (which I have already done, but more people can do it as well I suppose). Softlavender ( talk) 10:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as a redirect to list of important operas. If these were separate lists, they had been merged before I got here. So I moved it all to list of important operas. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per my note below. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
The opera corpus
- The opera corpus ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redundant to List of important operas.
The two articles share identical scope (though not content: this one is an indiscriminately bloated and completely unreferenced assortment, the other one is a Featured List). I see no prospects for a merger so this one has to go. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 07:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a valuable list of opera composers and their most important operas. The scope, format, order, content, and text of List of important operas is completely and utterly different, as even a passing glance reveals. Softlavender ( talk) 09:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a very useful list, which should be kept under its original name,
The opera corpus.
Cote d'Azur (
talk) 09:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I've returned the article to its original title, as it had been moved to an inaccurate title without discussion. See the thread I started on the article's talk page. Softlavender ( talk) 10:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep – This list is not redundant. It is more inclusive than the List of important operas. It is a helpful encyclopedic compendium/almanac of a wide range of operas, and its red links are useful to identify missing articles. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 09:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: This list is currently listed here, at AfD, and it's PRODed at the same time; shouldn't it be one or the other? --
Michael Bednarek (
talk) 09:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- It wasn't PRODed, it was SPEEDYed. The way to contest a CSD is to click the link in the template (which I have already done, but more people can do it as well I suppose). Softlavender ( talk) 10:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as a redirect to list of important operas. If these were separate lists, they had been merged before I got here. So I moved it all to list of important operas. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.