The result of the debate was Delete (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Previous nominations: March 2004, October 2004, October 2005
I'd like to nominate this for deletion for several reasons:
I'm not a deletionist or inclusionists. I don't like such labels and I don't think they have any place on Wikipedia. But I do think that this article is plain silly. I acknowledge that people have put a fair amount into compiling this list, but frankly this fact does not make the article any more useful.
TH 14:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Note: This nom was orphaned so I am now listing it properly. -- W.marsh 20:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC) reply
In conclusion, I just don't get deleting the article. Especially, as per above, if the consensus has kept it on for two times already.-- Ljlego 02:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Previous nominations: March 2004, October 2004, October 2005
I'd like to nominate this for deletion for several reasons:
I'm not a deletionist or inclusionists. I don't like such labels and I don't think they have any place on Wikipedia. But I do think that this article is plain silly. I acknowledge that people have put a fair amount into compiling this list, but frankly this fact does not make the article any more useful.
TH 14:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Note: This nom was orphaned so I am now listing it properly. -- W.marsh 20:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC) reply
In conclusion, I just don't get deleting the article. Especially, as per above, if the consensus has kept it on for two times already.-- Ljlego 02:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply