The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW
joe deckertalk 06:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)reply
This article should be deleted because it fails
WP:NOTDIR #5 because there is no reason to supply pricing information and there is no encyclopedic significance to the pricing information. The article also fails
WP:NOTDIR #7 because it is a listing of metro systems with little context. The article is also
WP:LISTCRUFT definitions #6, #8, and #12. The article fails
WP:LISTNAME by being a too broad topic. KAP03Talk • Contributions 16:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete.
WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Also, it would be impracticable to keep this list up to date, and most of the entries are empty, so it is not at all a helpful article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "
JamesBWatson" (
talk) 16:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
delete I'm not even sure this is meaningful, given systems like the DC metro where the fare depends on the trip.
Mangoe (
talk) 17:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as obviously unmeaningful. There are some metro systems that only cover a few kilometres, but others, such as London's, that cover a very large area. Also exchange rates fluctuate from day to day and much more so from year to year.
86.17.222.157 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 20:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW
joe deckertalk 06:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)reply
This article should be deleted because it fails
WP:NOTDIR #5 because there is no reason to supply pricing information and there is no encyclopedic significance to the pricing information. The article also fails
WP:NOTDIR #7 because it is a listing of metro systems with little context. The article is also
WP:LISTCRUFT definitions #6, #8, and #12. The article fails
WP:LISTNAME by being a too broad topic. KAP03Talk • Contributions 16:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete.
WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Also, it would be impracticable to keep this list up to date, and most of the entries are empty, so it is not at all a helpful article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "
JamesBWatson" (
talk) 16:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
delete I'm not even sure this is meaningful, given systems like the DC metro where the fare depends on the trip.
Mangoe (
talk) 17:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as obviously unmeaningful. There are some metro systems that only cover a few kilometres, but others, such as London's, that cover a very large area. Also exchange rates fluctuate from day to day and much more so from year to year.
86.17.222.157 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 20:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.