- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of magic effects manufacturers ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced empty list article – S. Rich ( talk) 00:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 07:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Previously consisted solely of non-notable or unsupported entries. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Magic and Companies. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious fail of WP:LISTN. Ajf773 ( talk) 08:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Currently has only one entry (which is redlinked, no less). It also sounds very...how do I put this? Like, the comparison between large corporations and smaller manufacturers seems off- tone. I can't figure out how to reword it, so I would probably delete that part, which would make the lede even shorter. Asparagusus (interaction) 13:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of magic effects manufacturers ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced empty list article – S. Rich ( talk) 00:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 07:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Previously consisted solely of non-notable or unsupported entries. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Magic and Companies. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious fail of WP:LISTN. Ajf773 ( talk) 08:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Currently has only one entry (which is redlinked, no less). It also sounds very...how do I put this? Like, the comparison between large corporations and smaller manufacturers seems off- tone. I can't figure out how to reword it, so I would probably delete that part, which would make the lede even shorter. Asparagusus (interaction) 13:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.