![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 November 24. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 10:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
WP:Listcruft. I do not see the point in having that list. Lists on WP are not a notable subject. Gunnar Hendrich ( talk) 00:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete as nominator. Gunnar Hendrich ( talk) 00:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Contrary to the long list of !votes above, I'm going to go with keep as a list that serves a navigational function. This is perfectly encyclopaedic, because encyclopaedias benefit from contents pages.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 21:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 November 24. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 10:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
WP:Listcruft. I do not see the point in having that list. Lists on WP are not a notable subject. Gunnar Hendrich ( talk) 00:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete as nominator. Gunnar Hendrich ( talk) 00:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Contrary to the long list of !votes above, I'm going to go with keep as a list that serves a navigational function. This is perfectly encyclopaedic, because encyclopaedias benefit from contents pages.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 21:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC) reply