The result was delete. Courcelles 17:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC) reply
List is of little or no academic value. WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE argument applies, as this article is a clear example of listcruft. List is a duplication of the Official website listing of highest totals, and even uses the same $30,000 threshold. Only other source listed is a non-official, non-published fansite. Other list articles of "Highest X" or "Largest Y" are appropriately sourced, well-organized and do not contain nearly the amount of information thrown into this article. Sottolacqua ( talk) 21:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC) reply
List is of little or no academic value. WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE argument applies, as this article is a clear example of listcruft. List is a duplication of the Official website listing of highest totals, and even uses the same $30,000 threshold. Only other source listed is a non-official, non-published fansite. Other list articles of "Highest X" or "Largest Y" are appropriately sourced, well-organized and do not contain nearly the amount of information thrown into this article. Sottolacqua ( talk) 21:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply