The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, no relevant rationale given. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There's no stated criteria for belonging to this list other than apparently using the words "homopolar" and "generator" in the patent text. There's no significance given for inclusion of any entry, (many patents never get practiced), no explanation of the importance of any particular patent, and no encyclopediac value in retaining this product of an automated database search. The article to talk about the development of homopolar generators exists, it's called Homopolar generator. Wtshymanski ( talk) 01:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, no relevant rationale given. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There's no stated criteria for belonging to this list other than apparently using the words "homopolar" and "generator" in the patent text. There's no significance given for inclusion of any entry, (many patents never get practiced), no explanation of the importance of any particular patent, and no encyclopediac value in retaining this product of an automated database search. The article to talk about the development of homopolar generators exists, it's called Homopolar generator. Wtshymanski ( talk) 01:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC) reply