The result was delete. primarily because I see no convincing arguments to Keep this article except from an sockpuppet whose contributions were struck. Liz Read! Talk! 06:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I nominated this article for WP:PROD, which was contested by editor Codenamewolf. This is a curious unreferenced list, whose individual entries are likely to fail the relevant notability guideline at WP:GEOFEAT. Only a handful of the list's entries have standalone articles, and I am not sure that reader interest really justifies a list article (though a category and See also mentions in the other flyover articles may be appropriate). I note that WP:NLIST says:
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.
If editors can find sources that have discussed Pakistan's flyovers as a set, and save this article from deletion, that will be a very welcome outcome of this AfD.
For disclosure, there are four other List of flyovers in [X] or List of flyovers and under-passes in [X] articles (for cities or regions in Pakistan or India) that currently have a PROD tag; if it emerges that there is reasonable doubt that this article should not be deleted, I will remove those tags – or of course, any editor may do so, without waiting to see the consensus that forms here. IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 11:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More discussion around the extent to which this list does or does not have a
reasonable navigational purpose in light of our
list inclusion criteria would be helpful in attaining a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
00:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. primarily because I see no convincing arguments to Keep this article except from an sockpuppet whose contributions were struck. Liz Read! Talk! 06:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I nominated this article for WP:PROD, which was contested by editor Codenamewolf. This is a curious unreferenced list, whose individual entries are likely to fail the relevant notability guideline at WP:GEOFEAT. Only a handful of the list's entries have standalone articles, and I am not sure that reader interest really justifies a list article (though a category and See also mentions in the other flyover articles may be appropriate). I note that WP:NLIST says:
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.
If editors can find sources that have discussed Pakistan's flyovers as a set, and save this article from deletion, that will be a very welcome outcome of this AfD.
For disclosure, there are four other List of flyovers in [X] or List of flyovers and under-passes in [X] articles (for cities or regions in Pakistan or India) that currently have a PROD tag; if it emerges that there is reasonable doubt that this article should not be deleted, I will remove those tags – or of course, any editor may do so, without waiting to see the consensus that forms here. IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 11:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More discussion around the extent to which this list does or does not have a
reasonable navigational purpose in light of our
list inclusion criteria would be helpful in attaining a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
00:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)