The result was no consensus. Valid (and invalid) arguments made both to keep and delete. See you back here in another 18 months. Beeblebrox ( talk) 02:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC) reply
No criteria for inclusion, no sources, indiscriminate. To quote rationale from last AFD: "AfD result from [2007] was "keep" based solely on "it's useful" and "keep if improved" votes. Well, it hasn't been improved any; it's still unsourced and there are no definite criteria, as evidenced by how LONG the list is." I fail to see how the last AFD showed a consensus to keep; that one, too, showed nothing but WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:ILIKEIT !votes from every single keeper. Some even argued that sources did exist but couldn't possibly be arsed to fix it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
However, I do agree it looks like a trivial list that most people would like or find useful. The article really needs to be titled something like "List of meta-fictional television shows" or "Fiction within fiction on television". Now if fiction within fiction has some real-world notability, then it would be a straight keep, tag for cleanup and move on from me! Lugnuts ( talk) 08:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Valid (and invalid) arguments made both to keep and delete. See you back here in another 18 months. Beeblebrox ( talk) 02:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC) reply
No criteria for inclusion, no sources, indiscriminate. To quote rationale from last AFD: "AfD result from [2007] was "keep" based solely on "it's useful" and "keep if improved" votes. Well, it hasn't been improved any; it's still unsourced and there are no definite criteria, as evidenced by how LONG the list is." I fail to see how the last AFD showed a consensus to keep; that one, too, showed nothing but WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:ILIKEIT !votes from every single keeper. Some even argued that sources did exist but couldn't possibly be arsed to fix it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
However, I do agree it looks like a trivial list that most people would like or find useful. The article really needs to be titled something like "List of meta-fictional television shows" or "Fiction within fiction on television". Now if fiction within fiction has some real-world notability, then it would be a straight keep, tag for cleanup and move on from me! Lugnuts ( talk) 08:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply