The result was delete. After two no-consensus closes over the last five years, this time there is a consensus. DGG is quite right that there is no deadline, so if anyone wants to work on this article in user-space, please let me know. Courcelles ( talk) 14:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply
List which fails WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:IINFO. Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information, and a large list of fictional military organisations seems to be edging on that. It's so broad that the list doesn't really serve any purpose - it details both fictional regiments from real armies, fictional armies of real places and fictional armies of fictional nations. Furthermore, "fiction" has become an extremely broad term - this list covers not only literature, but film and video-games. Two previous AFDs lead to no consensus. Claritas § 17:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. After two no-consensus closes over the last five years, this time there is a consensus. DGG is quite right that there is no deadline, so if anyone wants to work on this article in user-space, please let me know. Courcelles ( talk) 14:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply
List which fails WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:IINFO. Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information, and a large list of fictional military organisations seems to be edging on that. It's so broad that the list doesn't really serve any purpose - it details both fictional regiments from real armies, fictional armies of real places and fictional armies of fictional nations. Furthermore, "fiction" has become an extremely broad term - this list covers not only literature, but film and video-games. Two previous AFDs lead to no consensus. Claritas § 17:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply