The result was delete. Nja 247 08:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I was about to remove the original research (and the single fact cited to an unreliable source) from this article when I realized this would leave only the "see also". This has been tagged as unreferenced for over two years. While a decent article on this subject might someday exist, that article would neither begin nor end with anything even close to this one. A Wikipedia article needs to be verified to reliable, third party sources, and I see no evidence this one will ever do that by following its current course. Mintrick ( talk) 00:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Nja 247 08:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I was about to remove the original research (and the single fact cited to an unreliable source) from this article when I realized this would leave only the "see also". This has been tagged as unreferenced for over two years. While a decent article on this subject might someday exist, that article would neither begin nor end with anything even close to this one. A Wikipedia article needs to be verified to reliable, third party sources, and I see no evidence this one will ever do that by following its current course. Mintrick ( talk) 00:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC) reply