The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. postdlf (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The world is listed as having a 233M population, but
sources show estimates of 350M to 370M. China is listed as having a population of 233 people, India as 211 people, and the US as 198 people. That's all the content. The edit summaries in creating this give me pause about
WP:AGF.
Ramaksoud2000(Talk to me) 06:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as per
WP:G3. Blatant hoax article. Author has a history of disruptive editing.
Ajf773 (
talk) 07:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not seem to be a serious article. Even if it were the topic itself violates several WP policies.
Kitfoxxe (
talk) 09:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. postdlf (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The world is listed as having a 233M population, but
sources show estimates of 350M to 370M. China is listed as having a population of 233 people, India as 211 people, and the US as 198 people. That's all the content. The edit summaries in creating this give me pause about
WP:AGF.
Ramaksoud2000(Talk to me) 06:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as per
WP:G3. Blatant hoax article. Author has a history of disruptive editing.
Ajf773 (
talk) 07:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not seem to be a serious article. Even if it were the topic itself violates several WP policies.
Kitfoxxe (
talk) 09:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.