The result was No Consensus defaulting to Keep. There is no consensus that I can see between those who think the list is inherently POV and unmaintainable, and those who think the issues with the list can be solved and that it is a valid topic for a list. I encourage those who think it should be kept (and others of course!) to discuss on the talk page ways to improve the list. Davewild ( talk) 11:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination, this article was tagged as prod, but was previously kept in an AfD. Switching to AfD on behalf of the nominator, User:Largoplazo -- lucasbfr talk 17:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Proposed deletion text follows:
Two reasons:
Therefore, the article's title is a misnomer and the article doesn't serve the purpose implied by its title.
Summary: the current and potential utility of this article are both low.
This is not a vote, but a discussion. Voice opinions, not numbers.
The result was No Consensus defaulting to Keep. There is no consensus that I can see between those who think the list is inherently POV and unmaintainable, and those who think the issues with the list can be solved and that it is a valid topic for a list. I encourage those who think it should be kept (and others of course!) to discuss on the talk page ways to improve the list. Davewild ( talk) 11:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination, this article was tagged as prod, but was previously kept in an AfD. Switching to AfD on behalf of the nominator, User:Largoplazo -- lucasbfr talk 17:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Proposed deletion text follows:
Two reasons:
Therefore, the article's title is a misnomer and the article doesn't serve the purpose implied by its title.
Summary: the current and potential utility of this article are both low.
This is not a vote, but a discussion. Voice opinions, not numbers.