The result was Keep, although the "list" is in need of some massive cleanup as noted. Marking as such. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 23:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is full of WP:OR and WP:SYN. I see no way to fix the article to avoid that, so I have to conclude that Wikipedia is not the place for this. — BradV 04:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Finally, variations like Bogotá, Bogota, Bogotà, and Bógóta for the capital of Colombia are unnecessary. I can't bring myself to vote delete, because I think this can be transformed from "fun to read" to "encyclopedic and fun to read"; on the other hand, I can't vote for keep in its present form. Good idea for a topic, needs a more disciplined execution to work as an article. Mandsford ( talk) 16:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, although the "list" is in need of some massive cleanup as noted. Marking as such. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 23:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is full of WP:OR and WP:SYN. I see no way to fix the article to avoid that, so I have to conclude that Wikipedia is not the place for this. — BradV 04:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Finally, variations like Bogotá, Bogota, Bogotà, and Bógóta for the capital of Colombia are unnecessary. I can't bring myself to vote delete, because I think this can be transformed from "fun to read" to "encyclopedic and fun to read"; on the other hand, I can't vote for keep in its present form. Good idea for a topic, needs a more disciplined execution to work as an article. Mandsford ( talk) 16:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC) reply