- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- List of animals at the Minnesota Zoo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established for this sublist. There are only 6 or so zoos / wildlife centres / similar with their own animal list on Wikipedia, and I'll prod the other ones (unless they have some real claim to notability as a list.) This one survived a prod in 2006, but I see no reason why the list of animals at a zoo would be a notable subject in most cases. Fram ( talk) 09:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 09:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 09:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 09:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is cruftacular to the extreme. Is it an WP:ADVERT for the zoo in question? The opening line can belong in the main article - there is no need for this. Although on checking the article, it contradicts this total... Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't conceive of any reason why the list of animals at this zoo, or likely any zoo, would have independent notability. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 17:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as failing WP:LISTN. All zoos have animals, animals in zoos can and do change, and, in my view, lists of these sorts are undue trivia not worth even worth including in zoo articles (no merge or redirect warranted) let alone stand-alone lists. --Animalparty! ( talk) 18:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Snow delete. The only possible justification for a list like this is if the zoo had unique species or famous named animals. No Ling-Ling and Hsing-Hsing or Yetis here. Clarityfiend ( talk) 21:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Seriously? Pure WP:LISTCRUFT. Onel5969 TT me 02:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- List of animals at the Minnesota Zoo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established for this sublist. There are only 6 or so zoos / wildlife centres / similar with their own animal list on Wikipedia, and I'll prod the other ones (unless they have some real claim to notability as a list.) This one survived a prod in 2006, but I see no reason why the list of animals at a zoo would be a notable subject in most cases. Fram ( talk) 09:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 09:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 09:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 09:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is cruftacular to the extreme. Is it an WP:ADVERT for the zoo in question? The opening line can belong in the main article - there is no need for this. Although on checking the article, it contradicts this total... Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't conceive of any reason why the list of animals at this zoo, or likely any zoo, would have independent notability. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 17:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as failing WP:LISTN. All zoos have animals, animals in zoos can and do change, and, in my view, lists of these sorts are undue trivia not worth even worth including in zoo articles (no merge or redirect warranted) let alone stand-alone lists. --Animalparty! ( talk) 18:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Snow delete. The only possible justification for a list like this is if the zoo had unique species or famous named animals. No Ling-Ling and Hsing-Hsing or Yetis here. Clarityfiend ( talk) 21:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Seriously? Pure WP:LISTCRUFT. Onel5969 TT me 02:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.