The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article was created solely as a
WP:content fork for badly sourced info that was removed from the main
megalodon article for being insufficient. Later it was moved to the current title in an attempt to save it. The badly sourced info has no place on Wikipedia, other than perhaps as a single sentence in the Megalodon page or shark page, saying "there have been a couple of sightings of giant sharks", but that's about it.
FunkMonk (
talk)
12:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - The nominator was initially referring to List of alleged megalodon sightings, for which I used sources, a number of which were not been forked from megalodon, but after he
said in
Talk:List of alleged sightings of giant sharks that "giant predatory sharks" was better, I
renamed "List of alleged megalodon sightings" to "List of alleged sightings of giant sharks", and that was what I meant when I said '
closed' was that the initial thing about 'megalodon' was closed, not that others cannot say more there, I
rectified that error.
Leo1pard (
talk)
04:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC); edited 04:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article was created solely as a
WP:content fork for badly sourced info that was removed from the main
megalodon article for being insufficient. Later it was moved to the current title in an attempt to save it. The badly sourced info has no place on Wikipedia, other than perhaps as a single sentence in the Megalodon page or shark page, saying "there have been a couple of sightings of giant sharks", but that's about it.
FunkMonk (
talk)
12:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - The nominator was initially referring to List of alleged megalodon sightings, for which I used sources, a number of which were not been forked from megalodon, but after he
said in
Talk:List of alleged sightings of giant sharks that "giant predatory sharks" was better, I
renamed "List of alleged megalodon sightings" to "List of alleged sightings of giant sharks", and that was what I meant when I said '
closed' was that the initial thing about 'megalodon' was closed, not that others cannot say more there, I
rectified that error.
Leo1pard (
talk)
04:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC); edited 04:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.