- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe decker talk 00:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
List of albums awarded Best New Music by Pitchfork Media
- List of albums awarded Best New Music by Pitchfork Media ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no signficant coverage by third-party sources of this topic ( these few paragraphs by The L Magazine appear to be it, and this article is made up of nothing else but 549 citations to Pitchfork Media reviews). While Pitchfork itself is notable, WP:NOTINHERIT applies here. This isn't notable outside of the publication. The existence of other articles with similar issues of third-party coverage (as brought up in the first AfD) is irrelevant per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Simply put, to be considered significant coverage in reliable sources, it really needs coverage outside of just Pitchfork Media. If the Pitchfork list is being mentioned elsewhere, then the list concept is notable; if not, no.
The past discussion resulted in no consensus; two editors voted delete per the above reasons, one editor voted to keep this article because they were not familiar with WP:NOTINHERIT, and another who voted to keep the article was the main contributor to the article who only offered this student research paper from Brown University as a response. Another editor then erroneously claimed it was an academic source and Wikipedia accepts such sources. WP:SCHOLARSHIP is clear about academic sources being reliable and scholarly only when they have been peer-reviewed, and that student paper for some economics class has not been vetted.
Nothing in the way of reliable third-party coverage has been added to this article since the first AfD. Dan56 ( talk) 03:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as the nominator, per WP:NOTINHERIT and lack of significant third-party coverage. Dan56 ( talk) 04:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The article doesn't establish that being awarded "Best New Music" by Pitchfork is a notable distinction. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and my comments in the first AfD. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe decker talk 00:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
List of albums awarded Best New Music by Pitchfork Media
- List of albums awarded Best New Music by Pitchfork Media ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no signficant coverage by third-party sources of this topic ( these few paragraphs by The L Magazine appear to be it, and this article is made up of nothing else but 549 citations to Pitchfork Media reviews). While Pitchfork itself is notable, WP:NOTINHERIT applies here. This isn't notable outside of the publication. The existence of other articles with similar issues of third-party coverage (as brought up in the first AfD) is irrelevant per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Simply put, to be considered significant coverage in reliable sources, it really needs coverage outside of just Pitchfork Media. If the Pitchfork list is being mentioned elsewhere, then the list concept is notable; if not, no.
The past discussion resulted in no consensus; two editors voted delete per the above reasons, one editor voted to keep this article because they were not familiar with WP:NOTINHERIT, and another who voted to keep the article was the main contributor to the article who only offered this student research paper from Brown University as a response. Another editor then erroneously claimed it was an academic source and Wikipedia accepts such sources. WP:SCHOLARSHIP is clear about academic sources being reliable and scholarly only when they have been peer-reviewed, and that student paper for some economics class has not been vetted.
Nothing in the way of reliable third-party coverage has been added to this article since the first AfD. Dan56 ( talk) 03:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as the nominator, per WP:NOTINHERIT and lack of significant third-party coverage. Dan56 ( talk) 04:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The article doesn't establish that being awarded "Best New Music" by Pitchfork is a notable distinction. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and my comments in the first AfD. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.