The result was delete. No prejudice against a redirect. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This lists offers nothing new. There is no actual title, it's just 2 separate titles held together. Both title already have their own history lists here on Wikipedia and the article on the unified belts has the same info already as well. Prod removed by an IP (who I suspect is the same user that reverted me when I turned the article back into a redirect because the IP hadn't edited in 4 months). TJ Spyke 00:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep Notable and the World and WWE Tag Team Championships have seperate title histories and this would make it easier to see the each reign.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 00:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Yah but if they want one of the titles specifically they can go to that page and not this page.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 00:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Like I said before this would make it easier for people to look at the reigns when the titles are unified so it should be kept.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 00:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
My explaination is right.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 02:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This would make it easier for people just look at champions when the titles are unified.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Also as I've said before if they want one of the championships specifically then they'll go to that page.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm right but nobody else thinks I am show me the rule that says that I can't create this article.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 01:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Yah but this is not the same.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 02:53, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
It gives information about when the titles are unified the top part is also different and as i've said before this list make it eaiser for people to check reigns when the titles are unified so it's plainly different.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC) Also why don't you just put the information in Unified WWE Tag Team Championship in the pages for the World Tag Team Championship and WWE Tag Team Championship?-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I know it does but my past explainations say it all.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Yours do to.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This page is useful that's why it should be kept.-- Curtis23 (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Duh it does they both have different title histories.-- Curtis23 (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Merge. Looking at the three list articles, it would appear that every new "champion" from now on would have to be entered in three different places. This is not sensible. The canonical solution would be to identify whichever previous title is the more notable, rename it to the new title, then curtail the other list at the point in history where the titles were merged, with a note saying "For champions since the merger, see (name of article). Sussexonian ( talk) 12:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. No prejudice against a redirect. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This lists offers nothing new. There is no actual title, it's just 2 separate titles held together. Both title already have their own history lists here on Wikipedia and the article on the unified belts has the same info already as well. Prod removed by an IP (who I suspect is the same user that reverted me when I turned the article back into a redirect because the IP hadn't edited in 4 months). TJ Spyke 00:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep Notable and the World and WWE Tag Team Championships have seperate title histories and this would make it easier to see the each reign.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 00:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Yah but if they want one of the titles specifically they can go to that page and not this page.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 00:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Like I said before this would make it easier for people to look at the reigns when the titles are unified so it should be kept.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 00:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
My explaination is right.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 02:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This would make it easier for people just look at champions when the titles are unified.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Also as I've said before if they want one of the championships specifically then they'll go to that page.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm right but nobody else thinks I am show me the rule that says that I can't create this article.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 01:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Yah but this is not the same.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 02:53, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
It gives information about when the titles are unified the top part is also different and as i've said before this list make it eaiser for people to check reigns when the titles are unified so it's plainly different.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC) Also why don't you just put the information in Unified WWE Tag Team Championship in the pages for the World Tag Team Championship and WWE Tag Team Championship?-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I know it does but my past explainations say it all.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Yours do to.-- Zack Ryder Fan Give him a page 21:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This page is useful that's why it should be kept.-- Curtis23 (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Duh it does they both have different title histories.-- Curtis23 (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Merge. Looking at the three list articles, it would appear that every new "champion" from now on would have to be entered in three different places. This is not sensible. The canonical solution would be to identify whichever previous title is the more notable, rename it to the new title, then curtail the other list at the point in history where the titles were merged, with a note saying "For champions since the merger, see (name of article). Sussexonian ( talk) 12:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC) reply