The result of the debate was delete without prejudice. Punkmorten 09:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
A list of (allegedly) all South African laws. Delete as WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of (soon-to-be-outdated) information; such data is available at the relevant government website. Was de-prodded for the reasons that (a) at least some of these laws must be notable, (b) not every South African citizen has Internet access. To (a), one might reply: let's see the articles about these notable laws first; as far as I know we don't allow red-link lists. The answer to (b) is left as an exercise to the reader, but keep in mind that there are unlikely to be many printed versions of Wikipedia in South African libraries. Sandstein 20:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete without prejudice. Punkmorten 09:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
A list of (allegedly) all South African laws. Delete as WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of (soon-to-be-outdated) information; such data is available at the relevant government website. Was de-prodded for the reasons that (a) at least some of these laws must be notable, (b) not every South African citizen has Internet access. To (a), one might reply: let's see the articles about these notable laws first; as far as I know we don't allow red-link lists. The answer to (b) is left as an exercise to the reader, but keep in mind that there are unlikely to be many printed versions of Wikipedia in South African libraries. Sandstein 20:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC) reply