The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply

List of Raven challenges (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ( delete) – ( View log)

and this is notable... how? The series may be, but I was unable to find anything which would suggest a notable aspect of the series is these challenges. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^{( talk)} 19:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs reply

Challenges are the biggest part of Raven, it is a very notable aspect of the series! And how can we source it except by saying that we've seen the programme? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.132.61 ( talk) 20:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Comment: Thanks for letting me know on my talk page; I originally spun this article out from the main one on the show itself, as it was clogging up the main article body. The challenges as a whole are notable since they do actually make up most of the show, but you're probably right in the sense that a full and detailed list doesn't fall within Wikipedia's notability guidelines. SynergyBlades ( talk) 20:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Well I think the article should stay. What's the harm in information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.132.61 ( talk) 15:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Delete, too much information. Wikipedia is not a fan site. Stifle ( talk) 23:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  11:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k ( talk) 13:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k ( talk) 13:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and this is way too detailed and of limited interest. A brief summary of the challenges in the main article should suffice. Somno ( talk) 00:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Delete for lack of relevance. 86.26.132.61, you'll have to come up with more than WP:ILIKEIT.
• Delete Per above, and most of those images fail the NFCC...hard. Protonk ( talk) 05:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.