The result was Delete. Ignoring the speedy keeps, which are unapplicable in this case (a DRV-based procedural nomination is not a speedy keep argument), and some other opinions not based in policies or guidelines, we are left with a discussion on the available sources, which are in the end either not independent, or not indepth. If sources like the first two have to be counted among the best of them, then there is a clear lack of notability, as indicated by a number of editors in this (and previous) discussions. Fram ( talk) 09:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 6. Procedural nomination, I am neutral. T. Canens ( talk) 00:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC) reply
{{
cite journal}}
: |author=
has generic name (
help) (Attributes series popularity to the varied mecha designs){{
cite journal}}
: |author=
has generic name (
help) (Mentions an original Strike Gundam action feature being bundled with the March 2003 issue of Newtype Japan)The result was Delete. Ignoring the speedy keeps, which are unapplicable in this case (a DRV-based procedural nomination is not a speedy keep argument), and some other opinions not based in policies or guidelines, we are left with a discussion on the available sources, which are in the end either not independent, or not indepth. If sources like the first two have to be counted among the best of them, then there is a clear lack of notability, as indicated by a number of editors in this (and previous) discussions. Fram ( talk) 09:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 6. Procedural nomination, I am neutral. T. Canens ( talk) 00:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC) reply
{{
cite journal}}
: |author=
has generic name (
help) (Attributes series popularity to the varied mecha designs){{
cite journal}}
: |author=
has generic name (
help) (Mentions an original Strike Gundam action feature being bundled with the March 2003 issue of Newtype Japan)