The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The article
Kodomo no Jikan includes a list of characters as around 50% of its content, so this is unneeded duplication. If appropriate any extra material on characters could be merged into the main article.
Imaginatorium (
talk)
14:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Found here are character toy reviews
[1],
[2],
[3]. Character songs (This one being on billboard Japan)
[4]. Here is a link to story memoirs
[5]. Those links should be able to help expand on the characters and I only looked up Rin first. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
23:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment There is no problem having a list of the characters. The problem is that there are two lists of characters -- one in the main article, and one here. These two lists should be merged. Note that the guideline says (very sensibly) "there may be a separate article" for the list of characters, depending on length; in which case the list should be removed from the main article and replaced by the link to the separate article.
Imaginatorium (
talk)
08:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)reply
I would support expanding the plot and the removal of the character section on the main article as that is what I see on FA class articles. Character lists are on main article pages when there is no secondary article that covers the characters. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
18:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Any problems can be solved by normal editing practices. Deletion should be a last resort. Character list are perfectly acceptable, always have been, and always will be.
DreamFocus21:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per all the above. The issues are entirely editorial, and can be fixed through editing. Having a character list in the parent article is really down to editor preference. I personally prefer to put a link to the character link in the plot section and wikilink any character names to that article, however there isn't anything inherently wrong with how it's set up now (one is a summary, the other is not).
SephyTheThird (
talk)
22:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The article
Kodomo no Jikan includes a list of characters as around 50% of its content, so this is unneeded duplication. If appropriate any extra material on characters could be merged into the main article.
Imaginatorium (
talk)
14:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Found here are character toy reviews
[1],
[2],
[3]. Character songs (This one being on billboard Japan)
[4]. Here is a link to story memoirs
[5]. Those links should be able to help expand on the characters and I only looked up Rin first. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
23:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment There is no problem having a list of the characters. The problem is that there are two lists of characters -- one in the main article, and one here. These two lists should be merged. Note that the guideline says (very sensibly) "there may be a separate article" for the list of characters, depending on length; in which case the list should be removed from the main article and replaced by the link to the separate article.
Imaginatorium (
talk)
08:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)reply
I would support expanding the plot and the removal of the character section on the main article as that is what I see on FA class articles. Character lists are on main article pages when there is no secondary article that covers the characters. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
18:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Any problems can be solved by normal editing practices. Deletion should be a last resort. Character list are perfectly acceptable, always have been, and always will be.
DreamFocus21:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per all the above. The issues are entirely editorial, and can be fixed through editing. Having a character list in the parent article is really down to editor preference. I personally prefer to put a link to the character link in the plot section and wikilink any character names to that article, however there isn't anything inherently wrong with how it's set up now (one is a summary, the other is not).
SephyTheThird (
talk)
22:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.