The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails the 2018 RFC on airline designation lists which decided that exhaustive lists of airline destinations are not suitable content for Wikipedia. Per the subsequent AN discussion these should be nominated for deletion in orderly fashion.
Briefly, this is a failure of WP:NOT, particularly WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. The WP:NOT issue by itself is sufficient to warrant deletion, but if further reasons are needed it is a clear failure of WP:CORP since the only sources provided are the company's own website and a 404 link to a blog.
I am not WP:BUNDLING these nominations as I think it highly likely that unbundling would be requested. FOARP ( talk) 13:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails the 2018 RFC on airline designation lists which decided that exhaustive lists of airline destinations are not suitable content for Wikipedia. Per the subsequent AN discussion these should be nominated for deletion in orderly fashion.
Briefly, this is a failure of WP:NOT, particularly WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. The WP:NOT issue by itself is sufficient to warrant deletion, but if further reasons are needed it is a clear failure of WP:CORP since the only sources provided are the company's own website and a 404 link to a blog.
I am not WP:BUNDLING these nominations as I think it highly likely that unbundling would be requested. FOARP ( talk) 13:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)