From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Internet phenomena in Pakistan

List of Internet phenomena in Pakistan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SYNTH - Fails GNG. Those suggesting to keep this article must substantiate with evidence from RS that these listed "phenomena" are indeed are "Internet phenomena in Pakistan." Also delete per @ Arms & Hearts, who stated here given the existence of List of Internet phenomena and the fact that the internet, by its very nature, isn't affected by national boundaries, this seems unnecessary. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 19:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 19:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Lists. Shellwood ( talk) 19:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep meets WP:NLIST. Direct and in-depth coverage in Dawn ( [1]), Hindustan Times ( [2]), Times of India ( [3]), NPR ( [4]), Proft by Pakistan Today ( [5]), Youlin ( [6]). Additional coverage in academic journals ( [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]). Saqib, we're here to WP:BUILDWP, not to destroy. AFDs with lacking proper WP:BEFORE are becoming common in your case. Combined with the fact that you rarely vote to keep ( [16]), it shows how ardent a deletionist you are and how much damage is being done with these bad nominations. I have question: how many times you have rescued a topic that was up for deletion but was kept due to your proper BEFORE. I don't think there are many you can show us. Please stop nominating these borderline notable topics or someone has to ask admins to stop this. 2A04:4A43:8F7F:FCB8:465:8EEC:4116:BE64 ( talk) 12:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    • Hello IP - the article is titled Internet phenomena in Pakistan but the coverage you provided are primarily focus on some memes and the provided coverage doesn't even mention Internet phenomena in Pakistan so please just avoid WP:FAKE, as well WP:SYNTH, like i said before. Additionally, I can understand your frustration with my AFDs, so if you believe a t/ban is warranted, I encourage you to raise it at the appropriate forum, not in AFDs. —  Saqib ( talk I contribs) 13:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or draftify IP points out several nice sources above, but none of them are used in this article. It could be reasonable to write about Pakistan's internet culture and use of memes (if if's even distinct from anywhere else), but that is not this article. Here is just five specific incidents. Just because something was briefly trending on Twitter does not make it a "phenomenon" or notable. Surely there are many thousands of videos that have gone viral or resulted in a hashtag, but this not the place to compile anything that "generated trolling on social media" or resulted in people making memes. The global internet culture has changed so that many topics see brief fame, but Wikipedia is not the place to synthesize them like this. Reywas92 Talk 01:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Internet phenomena in Pakistan

List of Internet phenomena in Pakistan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SYNTH - Fails GNG. Those suggesting to keep this article must substantiate with evidence from RS that these listed "phenomena" are indeed are "Internet phenomena in Pakistan." Also delete per @ Arms & Hearts, who stated here given the existence of List of Internet phenomena and the fact that the internet, by its very nature, isn't affected by national boundaries, this seems unnecessary. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 19:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 19:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Lists. Shellwood ( talk) 19:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep meets WP:NLIST. Direct and in-depth coverage in Dawn ( [1]), Hindustan Times ( [2]), Times of India ( [3]), NPR ( [4]), Proft by Pakistan Today ( [5]), Youlin ( [6]). Additional coverage in academic journals ( [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]). Saqib, we're here to WP:BUILDWP, not to destroy. AFDs with lacking proper WP:BEFORE are becoming common in your case. Combined with the fact that you rarely vote to keep ( [16]), it shows how ardent a deletionist you are and how much damage is being done with these bad nominations. I have question: how many times you have rescued a topic that was up for deletion but was kept due to your proper BEFORE. I don't think there are many you can show us. Please stop nominating these borderline notable topics or someone has to ask admins to stop this. 2A04:4A43:8F7F:FCB8:465:8EEC:4116:BE64 ( talk) 12:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    • Hello IP - the article is titled Internet phenomena in Pakistan but the coverage you provided are primarily focus on some memes and the provided coverage doesn't even mention Internet phenomena in Pakistan so please just avoid WP:FAKE, as well WP:SYNTH, like i said before. Additionally, I can understand your frustration with my AFDs, so if you believe a t/ban is warranted, I encourage you to raise it at the appropriate forum, not in AFDs. —  Saqib ( talk I contribs) 13:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or draftify IP points out several nice sources above, but none of them are used in this article. It could be reasonable to write about Pakistan's internet culture and use of memes (if if's even distinct from anywhere else), but that is not this article. Here is just five specific incidents. Just because something was briefly trending on Twitter does not make it a "phenomenon" or notable. Surely there are many thousands of videos that have gone viral or resulted in a hashtag, but this not the place to compile anything that "generated trolling on social media" or resulted in people making memes. The global internet culture has changed so that many topics see brief fame, but Wikipedia is not the place to synthesize them like this. Reywas92 Talk 01:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook