- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. So Why 06:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- List of Indian law school rankings ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
From similar reasons to those used when List of Indian University Rankings was deleted, these lists should too. There is an issue of copyright in lists in quoting an entire list. The lists are also misleading, as few institutes are listed compared to the number rated and the ratings are not kept up to date. Finally, the data isn't even correctly sourced, and no one bothers to fix them for years. Muhandes ( talk) 14:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reasons:
- List of Indian business school rankings ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- Muhandes ( talk) 14:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete both as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian University Rankings. These articles are poorly sourced and act are more than enrolment guide rather than an encyclopedia as per WP:NOT. Ajf773 ( talk) 02:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. So Why 06:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- List of Indian law school rankings ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
From similar reasons to those used when List of Indian University Rankings was deleted, these lists should too. There is an issue of copyright in lists in quoting an entire list. The lists are also misleading, as few institutes are listed compared to the number rated and the ratings are not kept up to date. Finally, the data isn't even correctly sourced, and no one bothers to fix them for years. Muhandes ( talk) 14:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reasons:
- List of Indian business school rankings ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- Muhandes ( talk) 14:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete both as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian University Rankings. These articles are poorly sourced and act are more than enrolment guide rather than an encyclopedia as per WP:NOT. Ajf773 ( talk) 02:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.