The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 07:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable list based on a trivial connection which is not the primary claim to fame. The organization is notable, but notability is not inherited by the organization's leader as a result. Those individuals on the list who are not red-linked are only blue-linked because of a position of nobility that makes them notable otherwise. Considering that there are hundreds of Grand Lodges with hundreds of Grand Masters (each!) in their histories, this jurisdiction is not unique, nor does this list serve a unique purpose. MSJapan ( talk) 20:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep : i don't see why this page should be deleted. if people have the time to look at this page (which they do) then is becomes apparent that it does indeed have a reason for being here and a reason for existing. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
90.219.186.72 (
talk) 17:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 07:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable list based on a trivial connection which is not the primary claim to fame. The organization is notable, but notability is not inherited by the organization's leader as a result. Those individuals on the list who are not red-linked are only blue-linked because of a position of nobility that makes them notable otherwise. Considering that there are hundreds of Grand Lodges with hundreds of Grand Masters (each!) in their histories, this jurisdiction is not unique, nor does this list serve a unique purpose. MSJapan ( talk) 20:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep : i don't see why this page should be deleted. if people have the time to look at this page (which they do) then is becomes apparent that it does indeed have a reason for being here and a reason for existing. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
90.219.186.72 (
talk) 17:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
reply