The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I don't think we need List of General Motors factories and List of General Motors factories (detailed), just agree on what level of detail appropriate for the main list and stick to that. Having a proliferation of lists for the exact same subject but with different levels of detail is not helpful IMO, it's just a case of Wikipedia:Content forking. Fram ( talk) 10:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
This is a "one-stop shop" for information on GM factories.No, this is an encyclopedia. It is not a General Motors factory fanpage.
Unfortunately, there are some "editors" around who have made it their job to troll and harass others on the sole basis of invented reasons.I'm sorry you're offended by others who are following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, even if you think they don't apply to you. You don't get to say "Let's try to be more tolerant of one another" literally right after making personal attacks towards others. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
POV forks generally arise when contributors disagree about the content of an article or other page. Instead of resolving that disagreement by consensus, another version of the article (or another article on the same subject) is created to be developed according to a particular point of view. This second article is known as a "POV fork" of the first, and is inconsistent with policy: all facts and major points of view on a certain subject should be treated in one article. As Wikipedia does not view article forking as an acceptable solution to disagreements between contributors, such forks may be merged, or nominated for deletion.We are not Brittanica, and operate quite differently, we have no need for a Macro and Micropedia considering we have nearly unlimited ability to store articles and do not need to worry about fitting everything in physical books (this is discussed at WP:DETAIL). You and other editors need to come to a consensus at the original list regarding how much detail is appropriate; you can't just create your own version filled with excessive detail. Many of the factories are likely notable themselves, and that is where significant detail should go. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
If there is nearly unlimited space, as you just stated, then it shouldn't be an issue how much detail there is on a given page.- That is in direct conflict with the policy WP:NOTEVERYTHING, which states:
A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.I think TAOT was saying that we're not Britannica not because of any size limitations, but because we typically don't have both simple and detailed articles on Wikipedia. – Epicgenius ( talk) 12:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I don't think we need List of General Motors factories and List of General Motors factories (detailed), just agree on what level of detail appropriate for the main list and stick to that. Having a proliferation of lists for the exact same subject but with different levels of detail is not helpful IMO, it's just a case of Wikipedia:Content forking. Fram ( talk) 10:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
This is a "one-stop shop" for information on GM factories.No, this is an encyclopedia. It is not a General Motors factory fanpage.
Unfortunately, there are some "editors" around who have made it their job to troll and harass others on the sole basis of invented reasons.I'm sorry you're offended by others who are following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, even if you think they don't apply to you. You don't get to say "Let's try to be more tolerant of one another" literally right after making personal attacks towards others. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
POV forks generally arise when contributors disagree about the content of an article or other page. Instead of resolving that disagreement by consensus, another version of the article (or another article on the same subject) is created to be developed according to a particular point of view. This second article is known as a "POV fork" of the first, and is inconsistent with policy: all facts and major points of view on a certain subject should be treated in one article. As Wikipedia does not view article forking as an acceptable solution to disagreements between contributors, such forks may be merged, or nominated for deletion.We are not Brittanica, and operate quite differently, we have no need for a Macro and Micropedia considering we have nearly unlimited ability to store articles and do not need to worry about fitting everything in physical books (this is discussed at WP:DETAIL). You and other editors need to come to a consensus at the original list regarding how much detail is appropriate; you can't just create your own version filled with excessive detail. Many of the factories are likely notable themselves, and that is where significant detail should go. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
If there is nearly unlimited space, as you just stated, then it shouldn't be an issue how much detail there is on a given page.- That is in direct conflict with the policy WP:NOTEVERYTHING, which states:
A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.I think TAOT was saying that we're not Britannica not because of any size limitations, but because we typically don't have both simple and detailed articles on Wikipedia. – Epicgenius ( talk) 12:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)