The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. consensus after relisting DGG (
talk ) 02:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 14:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete- this is classic fancruft. Poorly sourced, overly detailed
directory of trivial fictional things. Merging anything of this stuff into another article would make that article worse.
ReykYO! 10:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment - I've reopened my
WP:NPASR closure on contentions from two editors. Regards—
UY ScutiTalk 10:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. As stated above in the clearly cited policies and guidelines that this article clearly fails, it's unencyclopedic because it's indiscriminant and non-notable
WP:FANCRUFTWP:N. There is no hope of notability, and no hope of coverage by reliable sources. It is ideal for an outside fan site like wikia. The closest we could have would be if the article for the overall series cited a review which mentioned select Cinco products by name, as part of prose. But that has nothing at all to do with this article, which is a huge waste of effort for Wikipedia.— Smuckola(talk) 18:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. consensus after relisting DGG (
talk ) 02:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 14:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete- this is classic fancruft. Poorly sourced, overly detailed
directory of trivial fictional things. Merging anything of this stuff into another article would make that article worse.
ReykYO! 10:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment - I've reopened my
WP:NPASR closure on contentions from two editors. Regards—
UY ScutiTalk 10:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. As stated above in the clearly cited policies and guidelines that this article clearly fails, it's unencyclopedic because it's indiscriminant and non-notable
WP:FANCRUFTWP:N. There is no hope of notability, and no hope of coverage by reliable sources. It is ideal for an outside fan site like wikia. The closest we could have would be if the article for the overall series cited a review which mentioned select Cinco products by name, as part of prose. But that has nothing at all to do with this article, which is a huge waste of effort for Wikipedia.— Smuckola(talk) 18:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.