The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia policy is explicit on this kind of thing. WP:NOT states Wikipedia should not contain articles that are "Lists of such definitions" or "A usage guide or slang and idiom guide". This article inherently fails WP:NOT. It lacks reliable sources for the most part, too (unless British Fart Slang is a reliable source), but that's not necessarily the issue. Failing WP:NOT is. This information, if it does not already exist there, could be transwikied to Wiktionary. Proto:: type 14:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC) reply
23:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia policy is explicit on this kind of thing. WP:NOT states Wikipedia should not contain articles that are "Lists of such definitions" or "A usage guide or slang and idiom guide". This article inherently fails WP:NOT. It lacks reliable sources for the most part, too (unless British Fart Slang is a reliable source), but that's not necessarily the issue. Failing WP:NOT is. This information, if it does not already exist there, could be transwikied to Wiktionary. Proto:: type 14:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC) reply
23:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)