The result was no consensus. By the way, since Billboard charts are based on factual data, copyvio doesn't come into play here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC) reply
An indiscriminate collection of information, also very much a chart trajectory listing entry into the top 10 (not the chart itself, but the top 10 of the chart), the date it peaked on the chart, and how many weeks on the chart. Almost impossible to source adequately: if every little detail isn't stated in a book such as by Joel Whitburn, ever single week by week chart would have to be referenced to indicate all this info, which just leans it more and more to a case of WP:IINFO. Except for #1's, a single chart cannot verify a song's peak position. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ( talk) 23:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. By the way, since Billboard charts are based on factual data, copyvio doesn't come into play here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC) reply
An indiscriminate collection of information, also very much a chart trajectory listing entry into the top 10 (not the chart itself, but the top 10 of the chart), the date it peaked on the chart, and how many weeks on the chart. Almost impossible to source adequately: if every little detail isn't stated in a book such as by Joel Whitburn, ever single week by week chart would have to be referenced to indicate all this info, which just leans it more and more to a case of WP:IINFO. Except for #1's, a single chart cannot verify a song's peak position. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ( talk) 23:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC) reply