The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - An impressive piece of work, in its own way, but not an encyclopedic treatment of an encyclopedic topic; which is to say, this is ultimately fancruft. Not appropriate content for WP, which is not a catalog or an indiscriminate compilation of information.
Carrite (
talk)
14:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - An impressive piece of work, in its own way, but not an encyclopedic treatment of an encyclopedic topic; which is to say, this is ultimately fancruft. Not appropriate content for WP, which is not a catalog or an indiscriminate compilation of information.
Carrite (
talk)
14:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.