The result was merge to List of Alpha Phi Omega chapters. Likewise for List of Alpha Phi Omega chapters (chronological). Sandstein 09:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
All of the information in this list is also contained on the main list. Since the list can be sorted, there is no need to keep a separate article. Dolotta ( talk) 22:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
FratChapter}}
or {{
FratChapter2}}
templates that can be used. While the template itself may be clunky, they do show which columns are commonly presented, and those seem only to care that the group is currently active or not, and not their entire active/inactive history, although that could be added to the Notes column. The geographic one is only useful if there are plans to show the 11 regions on a map or if the chapters are logically divided by state. Sorting by founding year or national roll number is also already accommodated by the main list. I noticed that that the roll number presented and the founding date doesn't always line up but can be sorted nevertheless. You'll notice on their website, they just list a single table and not worry about geographical, leaving that to be a sortable key. Alumni chapters and other types of chapters are presented separately.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
16:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
FratChapter2}}
only has a single usage, it doesn't seem like a standard. (And if they would be counted as a standard, that should be looked at in
WP:FRAT, not here, I believe). The chapters are not logically divided by state, either in the current Regional/Sectional structure which was for the most part put into place in 1967, and the new one which will be put into place in 2018. For example, SUNY-Buffalo and CUNY aren't in the same region in either setup. I *believe* the last time they were in the same part of the organizational structure was in the 1950s. Yes, the founding date and the roll number don't always line up, but with two exceptions which I can go further into, they are close. Both are currently sortable, I believe. And given that the national Alpha Phi Omega website has changed the software and output of the list of active chapters twice since the wikipedia article was created, I'm not sure that is useful. (Also, without additional work, accessing the inactive chapters there is painful.) I don't know if you noticed, but the website list of active chapters is nowhere listed as a reference. (The national magazine, the torch and trefoil, OTOH, is.) As for whether a map of regions or sections should be shown, I'm open to it.
Naraht (
talk)
16:38, 29 June 2018 (UTC)The result was merge to List of Alpha Phi Omega chapters. Likewise for List of Alpha Phi Omega chapters (chronological). Sandstein 09:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
All of the information in this list is also contained on the main list. Since the list can be sorted, there is no need to keep a separate article. Dolotta ( talk) 22:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
FratChapter}}
or {{
FratChapter2}}
templates that can be used. While the template itself may be clunky, they do show which columns are commonly presented, and those seem only to care that the group is currently active or not, and not their entire active/inactive history, although that could be added to the Notes column. The geographic one is only useful if there are plans to show the 11 regions on a map or if the chapters are logically divided by state. Sorting by founding year or national roll number is also already accommodated by the main list. I noticed that that the roll number presented and the founding date doesn't always line up but can be sorted nevertheless. You'll notice on their website, they just list a single table and not worry about geographical, leaving that to be a sortable key. Alumni chapters and other types of chapters are presented separately.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
16:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
FratChapter2}}
only has a single usage, it doesn't seem like a standard. (And if they would be counted as a standard, that should be looked at in
WP:FRAT, not here, I believe). The chapters are not logically divided by state, either in the current Regional/Sectional structure which was for the most part put into place in 1967, and the new one which will be put into place in 2018. For example, SUNY-Buffalo and CUNY aren't in the same region in either setup. I *believe* the last time they were in the same part of the organizational structure was in the 1950s. Yes, the founding date and the roll number don't always line up, but with two exceptions which I can go further into, they are close. Both are currently sortable, I believe. And given that the national Alpha Phi Omega website has changed the software and output of the list of active chapters twice since the wikipedia article was created, I'm not sure that is useful. (Also, without additional work, accessing the inactive chapters there is painful.) I don't know if you noticed, but the website list of active chapters is nowhere listed as a reference. (The national magazine, the torch and trefoil, OTOH, is.) As for whether a map of regions or sections should be shown, I'm open to it.
Naraht (
talk)
16:38, 29 June 2018 (UTC)