- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of 3D animation software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability/usefulness not demonstrated. Just a list of licenses of softwares. Greatder ( talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Software, and Lists. Greatder ( talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: This list fails WP:NLIST as we cannot say that the list deserves to exist per the article's first sentence, "this is a list of 3D animation apps that have articles on Wikipedia". Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)- Why did you link something that literally contradicts what you said?
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.
Why? I Ask ( talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)- Thanks for pointing that one out Why? I Ask! I think it should therefore be kept. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you link something that literally contradicts what you said?
- Keep Valid navigational list. More useful than a category since more information is shown. It is useful if you want to see a list of all the software of this type, and be able to sort it by its type of license to find what you are looking for. Additional information could be added, a column showing what year it became available, another column listing if its still being developed and if not just list when the last update was, etc. Dream Focus 16:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The mere fact that all of these have a Wikipedia page makes it a valid list under WP:LISTPURP. Why? I Ask ( talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of 3D animation software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability/usefulness not demonstrated. Just a list of licenses of softwares. Greatder ( talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Software, and Lists. Greatder ( talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: This list fails WP:NLIST as we cannot say that the list deserves to exist per the article's first sentence, "this is a list of 3D animation apps that have articles on Wikipedia". Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)- Why did you link something that literally contradicts what you said?
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.
Why? I Ask ( talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)- Thanks for pointing that one out Why? I Ask! I think it should therefore be kept. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you link something that literally contradicts what you said?
- Keep Valid navigational list. More useful than a category since more information is shown. It is useful if you want to see a list of all the software of this type, and be able to sort it by its type of license to find what you are looking for. Additional information could be added, a column showing what year it became available, another column listing if its still being developed and if not just list when the last update was, etc. Dream Focus 16:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The mere fact that all of these have a Wikipedia page makes it a valid list under WP:LISTPURP. Why? I Ask ( talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.