- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep per Wikipedia:Speedy keep#Applicability criterion 2B. Consult Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Conflict with editors in RfC and the rationales at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermann Oswald and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Noack. This is a non-administrator closure; per policy, such closures are subject to administrative review and may be reverted. North of Eden ( talk) 03:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Lisa Castel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability is established. No works are mentioned. No sources except one that proves of existence only. Jcmcc ( Talk) 20:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep Plenty of coverage in reliable sources♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- that search is less than persuasive. The 9th entry says that this name is a pseudonym.
[1] Evon on the first page of the search not every item is about her. After the first page of the search, none of the hits are about her.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
18:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Had a moment to come back to this, User:Dr. Blofeld, saw that you wrote it. So you can probably add enough persuasive detail, I imagine you must know her work. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- that search is less than persuasive. The 9th entry says that this name is a pseudonym.
[1] Evon on the first page of the search not every item is about her. After the first page of the search, none of the hits are about her.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
18:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep per Wikipedia:Speedy keep#Applicability criterion 2B. Consult Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Conflict with editors in RfC and the rationales at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermann Oswald and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Noack. This is a non-administrator closure; per policy, such closures are subject to administrative review and may be reverted. North of Eden ( talk) 03:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Lisa Castel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability is established. No works are mentioned. No sources except one that proves of existence only. Jcmcc ( Talk) 20:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep Plenty of coverage in reliable sources♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- that search is less than persuasive. The 9th entry says that this name is a pseudonym.
[1] Evon on the first page of the search not every item is about her. After the first page of the search, none of the hits are about her.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
18:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Had a moment to come back to this, User:Dr. Blofeld, saw that you wrote it. So you can probably add enough persuasive detail, I imagine you must know her work. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- that search is less than persuasive. The 9th entry says that this name is a pseudonym.
[1] Evon on the first page of the search not every item is about her. After the first page of the search, none of the hits are about her.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
18:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.