From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is narrow, but clearly and correctly argues the paucity of sources supporting encyclopedic notability. Deletion is without prejudice to restoration to draft, should additional sources supporting potential notability become available. BD2412 T 05:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Lisa Boothe

Lisa Boothe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable sources from which to build an article. There is one PolitiFact piece that fact-checks one of her claims about illegal immigration (finding it to be false). [1] We cannot build an entire article about that alone. I looked for coverage in the Washington Post, the NY Times, Politico and CNN, and could only find only find off-hand mentions of her in news coverage in those sources: her being a spokesperson for politicians and groups who are actually notable and in the news. [2] [3] [4] [5] and her filling in as a host for someone who was abruptly fired [6]. In other words, she is not the notable person in this coverage. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 02:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. This person is currently filling in for Tucker Carlson on Fox News, July 17, 2020 20:00EST. It seems relevant and informative to have an entry for her. I searched for it. References appear sufficient and credible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.203.238.232 ( talk) 00:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
^ This person has never edited before today. When the editor says "I searched for it", the Search results on Google are near-universally either op-eds authored by her or mentions of her as a spokesperson for actual notable politicians and groups. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 14:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep. The commentator is a FOX News contributor, and while she may not have a plethora of sources, sources are reliable. Article could use more references over time. WikiFixer337 ( talk) 14:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC) blocked sockpuppet. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 10:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham ( talk) 08:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: As literally the first guideline of GNG states, the article needs significant coverage, which this one does not based on a few mentions in a couple sources. The extremely questionable "keep" votes, including an IP that never edited on Wikipedia before but somehow found this AfD and a user who was created two days ago and only ever contributed on AfDs, seal it for me. Won't be surprised if someone's socking. GN-z11 09:43, 21 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination and GN-z11 above. Mentions like said Lisa Boothe, a spokeswoman for the group don't add up to significant coverage. XOR'easter ( talk) 18:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom.--Surv1v4l1st Talk| Contribs 23:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is narrow, but clearly and correctly argues the paucity of sources supporting encyclopedic notability. Deletion is without prejudice to restoration to draft, should additional sources supporting potential notability become available. BD2412 T 05:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Lisa Boothe

Lisa Boothe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable sources from which to build an article. There is one PolitiFact piece that fact-checks one of her claims about illegal immigration (finding it to be false). [1] We cannot build an entire article about that alone. I looked for coverage in the Washington Post, the NY Times, Politico and CNN, and could only find only find off-hand mentions of her in news coverage in those sources: her being a spokesperson for politicians and groups who are actually notable and in the news. [2] [3] [4] [5] and her filling in as a host for someone who was abruptly fired [6]. In other words, she is not the notable person in this coverage. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 02:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. This person is currently filling in for Tucker Carlson on Fox News, July 17, 2020 20:00EST. It seems relevant and informative to have an entry for her. I searched for it. References appear sufficient and credible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.203.238.232 ( talk) 00:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
^ This person has never edited before today. When the editor says "I searched for it", the Search results on Google are near-universally either op-eds authored by her or mentions of her as a spokesperson for actual notable politicians and groups. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 14:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep. The commentator is a FOX News contributor, and while she may not have a plethora of sources, sources are reliable. Article could use more references over time. WikiFixer337 ( talk) 14:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC) blocked sockpuppet. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 10:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham ( talk) 08:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: As literally the first guideline of GNG states, the article needs significant coverage, which this one does not based on a few mentions in a couple sources. The extremely questionable "keep" votes, including an IP that never edited on Wikipedia before but somehow found this AfD and a user who was created two days ago and only ever contributed on AfDs, seal it for me. Won't be surprised if someone's socking. GN-z11 09:43, 21 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination and GN-z11 above. Mentions like said Lisa Boothe, a spokeswoman for the group don't add up to significant coverage. XOR'easter ( talk) 18:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom.--Surv1v4l1st Talk| Contribs 23:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook