- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 01:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Liquid Web
- Liquid Web ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see that this company is notable. I just pared down quite a bit of promotional content based on unreliable sources including WHIR, which seems to publish rehashed press releases. Nothing meeting WP:CORPDEPTH remained. There are also issues of spamming by editors associated with the company (including likely undisclosed paid editing); if the company were notable that could be fixed, but I don't think there is enough reliably-sourced information out there. Huon ( talk) 01:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 01:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 01:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- a directory listing on an unremarkable company just going about its business. No indications of notability or significance, and significant RS coverage not found. Such content belongs on the company website, not here. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, very trivial, not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek ( talk) 16:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 20:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 01:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Liquid Web
- Liquid Web ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see that this company is notable. I just pared down quite a bit of promotional content based on unreliable sources including WHIR, which seems to publish rehashed press releases. Nothing meeting WP:CORPDEPTH remained. There are also issues of spamming by editors associated with the company (including likely undisclosed paid editing); if the company were notable that could be fixed, but I don't think there is enough reliably-sourced information out there. Huon ( talk) 01:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 01:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 01:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- a directory listing on an unremarkable company just going about its business. No indications of notability or significance, and significant RS coverage not found. Such content belongs on the company website, not here. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, very trivial, not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek ( talk) 16:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 20:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.