- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G12, taken from https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2992 -- Ed ( Edgar181) 19:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Limit of zero mass
- Limit of zero mass ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, incomprehensible. Mduvekot ( talk) 02:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 03:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as garbage. Xxanthippe ( talk) 03:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC).
- Delete as per nom - has no refs, makes no sense. Agricolae ( talk) 03:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as unreferenced and lacking in context. — Lowellian ( reply) 09:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – It is a copy of the abstract of this old Physical Review D article. As such, it is a copyright violation, and shorn of any context, it makes no sense. The article from which it was copied has never been cited in peer-reviewed literature, that I can tell, which makes me suspect it is either wrong, boring or both. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, OK. And here I was going to suggest it was written by one of those scientific jargon-bots that just strings together random sciency phrases. Let me add a third option to your conclusion - if the abstract is so impenetrable, maybe the whole paper was. Anyhow, now that I can wrap my mind around the context, I don't think there is any there there. The abstract seems to be talking about what would happen as the mass approaches zero. This page is like one based on a paper positing what would happen to helium as the temperature approaches the Limit of zero Kelvin. This namespace definitely approaches the Limit of zero notability. Agricolae ( talk) 03:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G12, taken from https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2992 -- Ed ( Edgar181) 19:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Limit of zero mass
- Limit of zero mass ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, incomprehensible. Mduvekot ( talk) 02:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 03:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as garbage. Xxanthippe ( talk) 03:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC).
- Delete as per nom - has no refs, makes no sense. Agricolae ( talk) 03:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as unreferenced and lacking in context. — Lowellian ( reply) 09:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – It is a copy of the abstract of this old Physical Review D article. As such, it is a copyright violation, and shorn of any context, it makes no sense. The article from which it was copied has never been cited in peer-reviewed literature, that I can tell, which makes me suspect it is either wrong, boring or both. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, OK. And here I was going to suggest it was written by one of those scientific jargon-bots that just strings together random sciency phrases. Let me add a third option to your conclusion - if the abstract is so impenetrable, maybe the whole paper was. Anyhow, now that I can wrap my mind around the context, I don't think there is any there there. The abstract seems to be talking about what would happen as the mass approaches zero. This page is like one based on a paper positing what would happen to helium as the temperature approaches the Limit of zero Kelvin. This namespace definitely approaches the Limit of zero notability. Agricolae ( talk) 03:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.