From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While not many comments, those that are here make good policy arguments to keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 12:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Lilongwe Wildlife Trust

Lilongwe Wildlife Trust (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As an environmentalist, it's unfortunate to nominate this but my searches at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam simply found some passing mentions so at best it's only locally best know but here we are at AfD for some insight. In case they're not watching and aware of this AfD, I'm notifying environmentalist Velella who may have som insight and also past users Melcous, Rhododendrites, UY Scuti, Larsona and 220 of Borg for their input. SwisterTwister talk 23:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While not many comments, those that are here make good policy arguments to keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 12:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Lilongwe Wildlife Trust

Lilongwe Wildlife Trust (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As an environmentalist, it's unfortunate to nominate this but my searches at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam simply found some passing mentions so at best it's only locally best know but here we are at AfD for some insight. In case they're not watching and aware of this AfD, I'm notifying environmentalist Velella who may have som insight and also past users Melcous, Rhododendrites, UY Scuti, Larsona and 220 of Borg for their input. SwisterTwister talk 23:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook