- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Lilia Mai ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A bunch of promotional fluff relying on PR sources. not notable yet. TheLongTone ( talk) 16:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - pure PR by operators who are not as "stunningly talented" as the artist is supposed to be. ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - this article is not written from a neutral point of view, as is evident from the first paragraph. It might be worth salvaging if the promotional tone were toned down a little. Vorbee ( talk) 17:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Google doesn't show anything that could be described as independent and verifiable: the whole page reads like a marketing exercise ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 19:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not every person who gets paid to sing is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per Johnpacklambert. Celestina007 ( talk) 16:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Lilia Mai ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A bunch of promotional fluff relying on PR sources. not notable yet. TheLongTone ( talk) 16:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - pure PR by operators who are not as "stunningly talented" as the artist is supposed to be. ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - this article is not written from a neutral point of view, as is evident from the first paragraph. It might be worth salvaging if the promotional tone were toned down a little. Vorbee ( talk) 17:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Google doesn't show anything that could be described as independent and verifiable: the whole page reads like a marketing exercise ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 19:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not every person who gets paid to sing is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per Johnpacklambert. Celestina007 ( talk) 16:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.