The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep — Proposing the deletion of such an article is sign of
Wikipedia:Recentism and, more broadly, lack of historical perspective. Though it might be difficult to find sources on the web, the party is clearly notable and is mentioned in several newspaper articles from the 1980s and several books. I hope this article can be kept as it is and in that case I would expand it, but, if that is not possible, please merge it with either
Liga Veneta or
Veneto Autonomous Region Movement at least. --
Checco (
talk) 06:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Merge into
Liga Veneta. Little relevance of this party – no sources really cover it, it currently fails
WP:V. Also I see no
WP:RS cited that talk about this party on itself, but rather they talk about Liga Veneta.
Yakme (
talk) 09:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: @
Checco If I have proposed the deletion of this page it is not sign of recentism or lack of historical perspective, but it is due to the fact that I have not found any sources on this party and therefore it has not left any mark on Italian or Venetian political history. However, in the event that the outcome of the AFD procedure is a "merger", I think that the most suitable target article for the merger is
Veneto Autonomous Region Movement (of which it contributed to the foundation) and not the Liga Veneta (of which it was one of the innumerable splits).--
Scia Della Cometa (
talk) 07:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep — Proposing the deletion of such an article is sign of
Wikipedia:Recentism and, more broadly, lack of historical perspective. Though it might be difficult to find sources on the web, the party is clearly notable and is mentioned in several newspaper articles from the 1980s and several books. I hope this article can be kept as it is and in that case I would expand it, but, if that is not possible, please merge it with either
Liga Veneta or
Veneto Autonomous Region Movement at least. --
Checco (
talk) 06:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Merge into
Liga Veneta. Little relevance of this party – no sources really cover it, it currently fails
WP:V. Also I see no
WP:RS cited that talk about this party on itself, but rather they talk about Liga Veneta.
Yakme (
talk) 09:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: @
Checco If I have proposed the deletion of this page it is not sign of recentism or lack of historical perspective, but it is due to the fact that I have not found any sources on this party and therefore it has not left any mark on Italian or Venetian political history. However, in the event that the outcome of the AFD procedure is a "merger", I think that the most suitable target article for the merger is
Veneto Autonomous Region Movement (of which it contributed to the foundation) and not the Liga Veneta (of which it was one of the innumerable splits).--
Scia Della Cometa (
talk) 07:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.