- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. May be WP:TOOSOON which editors should bear in mind should the article be recreated in the future. KaisaL ( talk) 17:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Lifepack ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable and promotional. A Yahooseach,cited in the edit history as providing refs, gets a large number of the usual press releases and notices. Based on all the other stuff that shows in in such searches, , there's actually nothing unusual about a backpack with a solar charger, and certainly not of a lockable backpack. DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - The two Yahoo references are dead. Only one remains and that is insufficient to show notability.-- Rpclod ( talk) 03:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I also concur with the analysis, my examinations have also found nothing better at all and it's clear this is still at the funding stages thus not yet better for notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, found this article from The Province - "Lifepack: B.C. inventor gets huge Kickstarter response to anti-theft backpack" [1], but not enough to keep, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON? Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment, have added fashion and technology projects to this article's talkpage so it appears on their article alert lists. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. May be WP:TOOSOON which editors should bear in mind should the article be recreated in the future. KaisaL ( talk) 17:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Lifepack ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable and promotional. A Yahooseach,cited in the edit history as providing refs, gets a large number of the usual press releases and notices. Based on all the other stuff that shows in in such searches, , there's actually nothing unusual about a backpack with a solar charger, and certainly not of a lockable backpack. DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - The two Yahoo references are dead. Only one remains and that is insufficient to show notability.-- Rpclod ( talk) 03:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I also concur with the analysis, my examinations have also found nothing better at all and it's clear this is still at the funding stages thus not yet better for notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, found this article from The Province - "Lifepack: B.C. inventor gets huge Kickstarter response to anti-theft backpack" [1], but not enough to keep, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON? Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment, have added fashion and technology projects to this article's talkpage so it appears on their article alert lists. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.